Interpretation of legal norms often involves subjectivity, even as courts strive for objectivity. Our approach transforms legal norms into precise mathematical models, limiting personal bias and variability. By encoding quantifiable metrics, we deliver transparent, reproducible standards of legal review that withstand rigorous scrutiny and promote consistent outcomes.
A mixed-integer linear programming model that renders the adequacy standard of Art. 11 ICESCR mathematically determinable, removing the indeterminacy objection to its justiciability.